fuck robert altman
Nov. 21st, 2006 05:12 pmI fucking hated robert altman.
that is, perhaps, an inaccurate statement.
I didn't know robert altman. I'm sure I would have thought he was a perfectly fine person if I'd known him personally.
more accurately, I hated his movies.
that is, also, a somewhat inaccurate statement.
the tense is wrong. they still exist and will continue to exist and people will continue to say "but what about this one! you must like this one!" for long after he's interred. and I will continue to hate them.
I could say they're pompous. I could say they're misogynistic. I could say a lot of things and they might be potentially true, but I would be talking entirely out my ass. the short, simple fact is that they bore the living shit out of me. I've never stayed awake through an entire altman picture. and thank god. at least by snoozing, I was making somewhat productive use of my time.
when a friend or lover calls up and says "hey, I'm at the video store. what should I get?" or words to that effect, I always give the same answer: "no robert altman movies and no period films starring winona ryder."
I'm sorry he's dead. at least, as sorry as I can be about the death of an 81 year old guy I didn't know who had a long, successful and, as near as I can tell, pretty comfortable life. but I'm fucking delighted to not have any more films to have to avoid.
except for winona.
that is, perhaps, an inaccurate statement.
I didn't know robert altman. I'm sure I would have thought he was a perfectly fine person if I'd known him personally.
more accurately, I hated his movies.
that is, also, a somewhat inaccurate statement.
the tense is wrong. they still exist and will continue to exist and people will continue to say "but what about this one! you must like this one!" for long after he's interred. and I will continue to hate them.
I could say they're pompous. I could say they're misogynistic. I could say a lot of things and they might be potentially true, but I would be talking entirely out my ass. the short, simple fact is that they bore the living shit out of me. I've never stayed awake through an entire altman picture. and thank god. at least by snoozing, I was making somewhat productive use of my time.
when a friend or lover calls up and says "hey, I'm at the video store. what should I get?" or words to that effect, I always give the same answer: "no robert altman movies and no period films starring winona ryder."
I'm sorry he's dead. at least, as sorry as I can be about the death of an 81 year old guy I didn't know who had a long, successful and, as near as I can tell, pretty comfortable life. but I'm fucking delighted to not have any more films to have to avoid.
except for winona.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-22 01:28 am (UTC)In his recent book on screenwriting - actually more an excuse to chest thump and waggle his cock under noses - Joe Eszterhas related an anecdote about Altman that escapes me in its entirety. I do remember either Joe or the person it happened to who related it to Joe was left with a lifelong hatred of Altman.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-22 01:44 am (UTC)the take on Marlowe was cool. I was asleep by the middle of the 2nd reel though.
Ah ha!
Date: 2006-11-22 04:02 am (UTC)Film editor Lou Lombardo, who worked with both men, compared Sam Peckinpah and Robert Altman this way: “Peckinpah is a prick and Altman is a cunt.”
BUT WAIT!
http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/031235987X/ref=sib_pdp_cap_0/002-9362129-2552024?ie=UTF8&keywords=Joe%20Eszterhas&ie=UTF8&v=search-inside#
Above link goes to an Amazon reader selection dishing more Altman dirt from Eszterhas’ book…not that you asked for it, but I am just ass-tounded at what you can find via the interweb these days.
Re: Ah ha!
Date: 2006-11-22 04:08 am (UTC)Man, I am all over people's bad blood for this dead Bob for some reason.
I'll stop now.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-22 01:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-22 01:47 am (UTC)I'm going to say no. for my winona-loathing purposes, I'm defining "period film" as "set in any era before the birth of winona ryder".
no subject
Date: 2006-11-22 04:24 am (UTC)"MASH" was passable, but the TV series (without the laugh track) was better.
"The Player" was OK but way too self-indulgent.
I don't mind Winona Ryder too much, but I never want to see another movie with Tom Cruise in it. Then again, perhaps that was a given.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-22 05:41 am (UTC)Seekrit love: Hal Hartley. Glad he's much younger and in seemingly good health.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-22 01:13 pm (UTC)Terrible!
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20061106.wshelly1107/BNStory/Entertainment/home
no subject
Date: 2006-11-22 06:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-22 02:21 pm (UTC)babylog. I just figured that I didn't know what the fuss was about and maybe I was too dumb to appreciate his film mastery or something.I thought Short Cuts was a deliberate attempt to be annoying.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-22 02:23 pm (UTC)At least "best" as defined by a period piece addict.
Seen The Prestige yet?
no subject
Date: 2006-11-22 03:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-22 04:57 pm (UTC)And I thought the MASH movie was moderately lame. If that's his high-water mark, ugh.
However, I'm a large Bonanza fan and Altman did write some of the better episodes of that. So, whatever 50 years ago he did something I liked.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-23 02:16 am (UTC)