(no subject)
Jun. 21st, 2005 06:54 pmshe also seems to not like Party Monster either, but I haven't seen that and so I don't know whether I'd agree with her on that or not.
I should add that I found the movie (the 2003 one) interesting and well-crafted and would recommend it to most people, but you might want to read
anyway, here's what I had to say about it. I'm probably full of shit in at least five ways. please point them out if you notice any of them.
---
huh. I didn't watch the documentary. didn't even realize there was one, aside from the interviews and various other DVD extras.
but I did watch dramatization (the movie with Culkin etc) and didn't see it even remotely the same way. my feeling was that the film depicted Alig as an out-and-out asshole, albeit a very charismatic and interesting one, and the "scene" as...well...a bunch of pretentious kids doing a bunch of drugs and dressing up funny. I don't remember the St James interview terribly well (watched it close to a year ago) but my recollection is that he seemed to see things very much that way: "we were so young and stupid, but it was a fun ride while it lasted."
I wonder why our perceptions differed so much. but, on a diffent note:
I don't know if the Club Kid scene was Art or not. that whole "what is Art?" discussion is one which I find an annoying waste of time, by and large. but I do think that "scene" was a descendent of and reaction to the Glam scene in the 70s, which was a descendent of and reaction to Kesey's Pranksters in the 60s, which was a descendent of and reaction to the Beats in the 50s, which was a descendent of and reaction to the Lost Generation of the 20s and 30s, which was a descent of and reaction to several other things which go back how many more decades of (counter)(pseudo)cultural history.
and it was definitely a major progenitor of the rave culture of the 90s (although not as major as Peewee's Playhouse, I often annoyingly argue), in the US at least. did any Art or Cultural Significance arise from the rave scene? I think it's too early to tell, but it did feed into the immense popularity of countercultural "arts" festivals like Burning Man and other lower-key, perhaps more ultimately effective local events and organizations and movements. many of which I frankly find rather silly and annoying, but may very well have lasting cultural and sociohistorical impact...or at least leave interesting descendants.
what were the hippies, the Lost Generation, the Beatniks, etc, after all but a bunch of pretentious kids getting fucked up and then writing about it? and how much of that writing was self-satisfied accounts (sometimes fictional or fictionalized) of "so and so got fucked up and killed someone"?
honestly, isn't "so and so got fucked up and killed someone" the plot of the Great Gatsby in a nutshell?
now, I'm not saying Party Monster is a "great work of art" (whatever that means) on par with _the Great Gatsby_ and I'm not saying it isn't, and I'm not saying the Club Kids were socially relevant or even especially interesting, but if you're going to single them out for their ethical stance (or lack thereof) and aesthetic values (or lack thereof), you might want to figure out why, of all the similar things upstream and downstream, they are singled out for particular ire.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-22 01:20 pm (UTC)I think a fun movie night trifecta would be Party Monster, Trainspotting, and, oh, Sid and Nancy.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-22 05:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-22 06:48 pm (UTC)